No absolution is given by us to DHS! Further, Restitution Upon Conviction Warrants the Immediate Freezing of Personal Assets (Real Property and Equipment)

No absolution is given by us to DHS! Further, Restitution Upon Conviction Warrants Immediate Freezing of Personal Assets (Real Property and Equipment)

No Absolution

No absolution is given by us to DHS for “self-reporting” embezzlement only when/as John Davis’ gubernatorial appointment by Gov. Phil Bryant neared its end and many on the executive team at State Office vied/vie to fill the long term position of Executive Director to be appointed by Governor Tate Reeves.

If anything, child care leadership feels the public statements given over years by now Interim MDHS Executive Director Jacob Black, and others close to him, enabled/enable state actor misconduct in the administration of federal block grants in spite of grossly unreasonable justifications, violations of statute and scandal.

We First Reported March 12, 2018 – Almost Two Years Ago

We “reported” questionable appropriations March 12, 2018, including to Eric Blanchette at ACF in Atlanta. See Delta Licensed providers: Financial Windfall from MDHS to Family Resource Center allows Staff Increase From 30 to 260!

Following that post was an invitation to lunch with MDHS Executive Director John Davis and Dr. Laurie Smith of the Governor’s Office, where I was able, at long last, to influence the first release of CCDF funding for new child care enrollment in five consecutive years. See Delta Licensed Providers: March 27, 2018 “Child Care Collateral Damage is Unhealthy for this State, Life Changing and Wide Spread!”

Atlanta Meeting Requested 

On August 14, 2019, a meeting was requested with HHS/ACF Region IV Office of Child Care Regional Program Manager Eric R. Blanchette.  To this day, he has not acknowledged or responded to our request to discuss alleged and ongoing wrongdoing in the adoption and administration of Mississippi’s CCDF/TANF State Plans.  Click here to see WLBT Red Flags: “We have been asking for help.”

Today

Families First Remains Open and held over parties have hired Butler-Snow Law Firm after receiving $65 Million in TANF Funds Over Five Years all the while Child Care Assistance was effectively “Defunded”. 

See Greenwood Commonwealth February 13, 2020:

https://www.gwcommonwealth.com/news/article_2b471f1c-4e13-11ea-9df5-47b93290c9d2.html

Personal Assets (Real Property and Equipment) Accumulated In the Course of the Corruption Scheme Should Be Seized as Proper Restitution to the poor upon Conviction

See: ‘Tremendous growth’ Family Resource Center expands presence in Northeast Mississippi

Since the Mississippi Department of Human Services got involved and reorganized these organizations, there has been a significant increase in funding from the state. That has resulted in new centers built across the state at an accelerated rate, expansion of programs and a substantial staff increase.

The financial windfall that resulted from the partnership two years ago has allowed FRC to open 15 centers across Northeast Mississippi and increase staff from 30 to 260 employees.

Click here to read the full article.

Please click on the links below to see the title to the real property occupied by Families First of Greenwood which remains in operation and see the verification that it has retained Butler-Snow Law Firm for representation with some source of funding.

AVALON HOLDINGS LLC

1506 HURON Mailing Address: P O BOX 12347
City: GREENWOOD City: JACKSON
State: MS State: MS
Zip: 39236

AVALON HOLDINGS LLC

https://cs.datasysmgt.com/tax?state=MS&county=42

https://cs.datasysmgt.com/tax?state=MS&county=42#TaxPanel:taxweb_details:08608010101100

https://cs.datasysmgt.com/tax?state=MS&county=42#TaxPanel:taxweb_details:08608010201100

https://cs.datasysmgt.com/tax?state=MS&county=42#TaxPanel:taxweb_details:08608010201110

AVALON HOLDINGS LLC

Avalon Holdings, LLC is a Mississippi Limited-Liability Company filed on March 8, 2005. The company’s filing status is listed as Good Standing and its File Number is 869004.

The Registered Agent on file for this company is New, Jesse S, JR and is located at 190 East Capitol Street, suite 100, Jackson, MS 39201.

The company has 1 principal on record. The principal is Nancy W New from Jackson MS.

The official CCDF Early Childhood Academy

The official CCDF training agency for child care providers serving low-income children in Mississippi is the Early Childhood Academy which has received merely/approximately $250,000.00 from MDHS to fund more than 20 locations at community colleges throughout the state!

Because MDCC had no room on its campus, plans were made to locate our Child Care Academy at Families First in Indianola.

I strongly opposed the Families First of Indianola location for our ECA

In addition to our localized protest (lack of support for MCEC and Families First’ no-bid funding and lack of a TANF public hearing) and concern for the organizations’ alleged entitlement/political advantage which we believed/believe greatly harmed low-income child care programs and innocent babies living in abject poverty, we did not wish to be the only ECA not located on a true college campus.

Fortunately, discussions that followed with Dr. Micah Knox of the Mississippi Community College Board resulted in the placement of our Early Childhood Academy at Mississippi Valley State University where college credits for caregivers might be earned and a demonstration pre-school for hands-on experience and instruction in curriculum and classroom management (much like short term student teaching for caregivers) may be established.

As I see it, these are the services and work that should now be given priority, fully funded and not interrupted!

Open House Friday – MVSU Early Childhood Academy 

There will be an open house of the MVSU Early Childhood Academy on February 21, 2020, from 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM.

All are invited to attend.

 

 


I Do Not Know Why the DHS General Counsel is Collecting Child Care Fees

I Do Not Know Why the DHS General Counsel is Collecting Child Care Fees

I do not know why DHS General Counsel Andrea Sanders initiated a new and expanded database to collect financial data/child care fees or how the information will be used.

I do know the purpose of A.P.L. (Administrative Procedures Law)    

is to let you know what your government is up to!

Below is the Administrative Procedures Law and guidance for policy makers developing a new or expanded database which is applicable to all entities receiving CCDF funding including NSPARC and the Standard application:

Any organization proposing to establish a new system of records, or to enlarge an existing system, shall give public notice long enough in advance of the initiation or enlargement of the system to assure individuals who may be affected by its operation a reasonable opportunity to comment.

§ 1320.8 Agency collection of information responsibilities.

(3) Informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of –

(i) The reasons the information is planned to be and/or has been collected;

(ii) The way such information is planned to be and/or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency;

(iii) An estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection (together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden);

(iv)Whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit (citing authority), or mandatory (citing authority);

ROUTINE USE: Allows for the disclosure of a record outside of the agency without consent. Disclosure or use must be for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which the information was collected.  (I don’t advertise rates – never have!)

Administrative Procedures Law also requires the following with regard to the Standard application:

§552. Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

(C) rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations;

(D) substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations of general applicability formulated and adopted by the agency; and

(E) each amendment, revision, or repeal of the foregoing.

Child care market rates are one rule established by DHS for reimbursement of services according to the age of the child. For example, an infant is assigned a higher rate of reimbursement than a full time child age two.

A substantive rule of general applicability is a separate rule that interprets how the market rate will be computed and paid to the CCPP provider.  For example, up to August 1, 2019, a reimbursement rate was set as a constant for the whole of a Certification Period. Prescribed age adjustments were not made until rollover or the next, new period of Certification.

Now, DHS General Counsel Andrea Sanders has reformulated the general applicability of the rule to reduce the reimbursement rates each month throughout the active Certification period following a child’s birthday – the reimbursement rate is no longer set as a constant and naturally, less reimbursement will be paid each month.

The rates remain the same and therefore, do not require any further action.

It is the new way the rates will be computed and applied that have changed – a separate act –the new formulation of general applicabilitythat triggers required APL and an economic impact statement. (See §552. (D) above.)

Mrs. Sanders did not follow the required APL.

She just put it into effect August 1, 2019, by simply authorizing a change in computer programming and then she casually announced it in a memo dated July 26, 2019.  

It is a frightening agency practice to witness!

It is reminiscent of the same state actor advantage, arrogance and environment demonstrated through the attempted finger-scanning method of payment…announced to us in a letter from Xerox requesting our private banking information and access to our accounts!

 

I only have confidence in the proper applications of Administrative Procedures Law.

       A Child Care Rally is being scheduled for later this month.

TRUST DHS OR FOLLOW US!


We Were Right to Pursue Legal Action in Suel v. MDHS and Xerox e-Childcare™.

We Were Right to Pursue Legal Action in Suel v. MDHS and Xerox e-Childcare™. 

Paying for child care services by the hour and minute, as Xerox e-Childcare™ was designed to do, is now prohibited by the Child Care Development Fund Block Grant!

This is not the first time over the last eight years policymakers at the highest level (SECAC members) proposed CCPP child care providers receive less than 2003 market rate fees for child care services rendered.

In 2012,  on such alleged recommendations, MDHS entered into a $10,000,000 contract with the Xerox Corporation to install and implement biometric finger-scanning machines designed to track the time and attendance of a child, down to fifteen minute increments, for reimbursement in child care fees that would pay less than the expected full-time fees for full-time slots industry standard and thus, generate ”savings” for the State. (Click here to read ”Separation of Corporation and State”.) 

Child care providers filed and won a law suit for restraint of the implementation of the payment system due to the State’s failure to provide a proper Economic Impact Statement. (Click here to read ”Final Ruling – No e-Childcare”.)

At the time, Jane Boykin, President of the former Mississippi Forum and the first Director to serve in the administration of the CCDFBG congratulated providers saying, ”Child care providers stood with our State’s children for over a decade while the State diverted money from their care.” (Click here to read ”Did you hear? We Won!”.) (Click here to read ”Effectively Defunded and Marke t Rates Increases Not Even Mentioned at SECAC!”.) (Click here to view video, “It’s going to makes some of their program’s suffer.”) (Click here to read Financial Windfall from MDHS to Family Resource Center allows Staff Increase From 30 to 260!)

In the 2014 Child Care Development Fund Block Grant Reauthorization, Congress actually prohibited the same such squeezed child care payments to child care service providers at §98.45 – Equal access:

(a) The Lead Agency shall certify that the payment rates for the provision of child care services under this part are sufficient to ensure equal access, for eligible families in the area served by the Lead Agency, to child care services comparable to those provided to families not eligible to receive CCDF assistance or child care assistance under any other Federal, State, or tribal programs (meaning comparable to programs serving middle and upper income families).

(l) The Lead Agency shall demonstrate in the Plan that it has established payment practices applicable to all CCDF child care providers that:

(2) To the extent practicable, support the fixed costs of providing child care services by delinking provider payments from a child’s occasional absences by:

(i) Paying based on a child’s enrollment rather than attendance;

(ii) Providing full payment if a child attends at least 85 percent of the authorized time;

(iii) Providing full payment if a child is absent for five or fewer days in a month;

As you can conclude, Mississippi has just not supported or implemented much of the guidance given in the Block Grant or other law including APL and Privacy Law.

In fact, this past March, NSPARC even recommended less than 2003 Market Rates for after-school care!

NSPARC has also – in violation of Administrative Procedures Law – designed and embedded MOST COSTLY National NAEYC standards and self-measurements into the standard application process for child care providers wishing to continue to serve low-income children all the while it (NSPARC) has been holding up the implementation of increased reimbursements that providers need to meet national standards of quality by failing to post NSPARC’s findings and recommendations for market rate increases on the Internet within 30 days of its completion of data collection in September, 2016, … as required.

As many providers have said, ”It looks as though they intend to hurt us.”

And what is to be said of the oversight provided by Region IV ACF/HHS that had previously expressed great concern that the initial rates increases proposed by MDHS in 2015 would not support quality?

Last week, MDHS announced that rates for afterschool care will indeed increase from the current fees set in 2003.

MDHS has not announced just what the increase will be.

It is now in effect and will be reflected in the June 15, 2018 reimbursement check.

The $10,000,000 paid, or perhaps not paid, to the Xerox Corporation has never been disclosed.

Xerox e-Childcare™ biometric machines are still in boxes, collecting dust, in child care facilities throughout the state!

No effort was made in such cases to return equipment and seek a refund.

Perhaps, we did, however, stop any further waste of long-term investments in a program that is now obsolete!

We do not know what NSPARC has been paid or how it has been paid for its CCDF services – another violation of the block grant/state plan.

There is so much more to be addressed!

Stay in touch with your legislators.

Always remember, we were right to pursue legal action in Suel v. MDHS and Xerox e-Childcare™!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


What does APL stand for?

 


Mississippi under scrutiny for its failure to use TANF funds for their proper purpose…which is Child Care.

Mississippi under scrutiny for failure to use TANF funds for their proper purpose…which is Child Care!

States are permitted to directly allocate federal TANF dollars, which are designed to assist needy families with child-care costs, the Sun Herald reported Tuesday.

But even with all the rhetoric given to validate the need for Preschool and early intervention as a means to reduce rates of incarceration down the road , MDHS has been investing TANF dollars to support Adolescent Opportunity Programs that provide resources to at-risk juvenile delinquents and their families – just the other way round!

Worse,  in 2013, Mississippi allocated none of the subsidies to child care, leaving more than $7.8 million in TANF funds unspent, according to the Department of Health and Human Services – the same year Jill Dent, now with the Department of Education, and DECCD introduced the proposed finger scanning method of payment designed to reduce full-time reimbursement costs to providers serving low-income children as a savings to the state.

Current 2016 reimbursement rates to CCPP providers are based on 2004 Market Rates.

State actors now warn that a proper increase to current market rates will likely mean fewer children and families will be served in 2017.

Also on Tuesday, the Clarion-Ledger reported only about 15 percent of federally eligible children in Mississippi actually received TANF benefits, according to a report by the Mississippi Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Since 2013, the number of licensed child care programs has fallen from 1,800 to approximately 1,575.

This report seems to validate concerns raised by the Mississippi Child Care Coalition that child care policies developed and dictated by State actors are having a disparate impact on self-employed child care providers and low-income families.

Regardless, State actors, in the new State plan, tout and screen for/screen out (by referral) providers unable to meet very costly “quality” demands and suggest even fewer children may be served in 2017 also due to new, mandatory twelve month periods of re-determination.

SECAC (State Early Childhood Advisory Council) has been charged (by the Governor) with the implementation of the new State Plan and will be working to fine tune and amend policy over a period of upcoming months.

To learn more about the State Early Childhood Advisory Council, click here.

 

 

 


US Commission on Civil Rights Meets Today: Is Mississippi’s QRIS effectively a Tool to Screen a Protected Group Out?

US Commission on Civil Rights Meets Today: Is Mississippi’s *QRIS effectively a Tool to Exclude a Disproportionate Number of a Protected Group from Top Tier Quality Bonuses and Pre-School Participation?

Open Meeting     Thursday     2 PM Central    

Call 888-505-4369   Give ID #4796911

Public Comment Period at the End

Disparate impact is a way to prove racial discrimination based on the effect of a policy or practice rather than the intent behind it.

For example, requiring all applicants for promotion (**or a reasonable increase from a percentage of 2007 market rates only through top tier quality bonus payments) to receive a certain score on a standardized test (or QRIS Evaluation) could adversely affect candidates of color.

Objective criteria, such as tests, evaluations, degree requirements, and physical requirements may be challenged under a disparate impact theory.

These cases rely heavily on statistics, published statements, data, and number crunching, which require assistance from experts and attorneys.

As an example, providers offer these statements to demonstrate potential intent to screen out and exclude a disproportionate number of people and minority owned small businesses through Mississippi’s Quality Stars:

“The QCCSS is an important step in identifying subpar centers, though the rating system does not directly measure child learning.”

Mississippi First- Leaving Last in Line

     Rachel Canter, Executive Director

 

“STAND YOUR GROUND LEGISLATORS, DON’T GIVE IN TO THOSE WHO WILL WHINE AND MOAN ABOUT HOW HARD THIS WILL BE ON SOME CENTERS. THEY NEED TO BE CLOSED AND REPLACED WITH ‘QUALITY’ OPERATIONS, NOT JUST SITES THAT MAKE A PROFIT FOR THE OWNER.”

Gulflive.com

education1st

Over a period of several months, the Mississippi Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has heard testimony and received information upon which it has based the final draft of an Advisory Memorandum of Recommendations to Congress which address potential racial discrimination in the administration of the Child Care Development Fund in Mississippi. (Click here.)

In addition to requested redress of Mississippi’s QRIS, the Committee’s findings state, “a number of African-American child care facility owners continue to view at least some of the state’s administration of CCDF as intentionally discriminatory on the basis of race. In the example of the ***electronic finger scanning initiative, the state maintains the program purpose was to address fraud. Some providers however, saw it is as an unnecessary barrier intended to withdraw support from communities deemed unworthy.”

“Furthermore, shortly after the program’s cancellation, the MDHS announced that all TANF workplace participants, who had previously been working in child care facilities across the state, would be removed and placed at ****alternative work sites because child care providers were not hiring them when they had completed six months of workplace job training. Many child care providers however, saw the move as direct retaliation for their resistance to the finger scanning initiative.”

The Committee will meet today to agree upon its final draft Advisory Memorandum, Thursday, November 19th at 2pm Central time. All Committee meetings are open to the public. If you wish to address the Committee directly you may join the call by dialing 888-505-4369 and providing the conference ID 4796911. A public comment period will be observed at the end of the meeting.

Melissa Wojnaroski, Civil Rights Analyst with the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Midwest Regional Office in Chicago, has announced it is possible that the U.S. Office of Civil Rights Enforcement will conduct further, more extensive investigations of potential Civil Rights violations following the submission of the Mississippi Committee’s work.


* ” Child-Care Rating Systems Earn Few Stars in Study” – Ed Week (click here); “QRIS Rating Systems Do Not Improve Learning or Social Development for Children” – Rand study (click here).

**According to the MLICCI, base reimbursement rates for providers through the CCDF program are already low— approximately 60 percent below Mississippi’s market rate. As such, many providers who depend on these funds cannot afford to make the necessary improvements to achieve higher rating.

*** The Xerox e-Childcare finger scan method of payment was proposed by Jill Dent who served at that time as the DECCD Director at MSDH.  Regardless of her highly contested proposal/policies/ideology being defeated in State Court, Jill Dent was appointed and now serves as Director of the Department of Education’s Pre-K Collaborative which requires QRIS participation among child care providers and costly maintenance of mid to upper tier quality scores.

**** Newly developed alternative TANF work sites (post State Court) include new placements in Head Start Programs (also licensed for child care) even though it is most likely that participating Head Start Programs CANNOT hire the TANF workplace participants as teacher-aides unless or until the TANF workplace participants complete 12 units of college coursework or CDA classes to meet Head Start employment requirements.    Adversely impacted child care providers (including those who formerly hired TANF workplace participants) note Head Start is not funded by the Child Care Development Fund and therefore, Head Start programs are now favored by MSDH because they were not involved in public opposition to the proposed Xerox e-Childcare finger scan method of payment.

 

 


MDE Makes Quite a Stretch Promoting (In-House?) Pre-K!

MDE Makes Quite a Stretch Promoting (In-House?) Pre-K!

It was such a stretch, it took review of the entire interview to get her message which boiled down to this – chronic absenteeism in kindergarten should be countered with (In-House?) expansion of Pre-K (?)!

View the Clarion Ledger’s interview of Dr. Carey Wright during MDE’s Chronic Absenteeism Press Conference: Report: Chronic absenteeism a problem for Mississippi schools.

I do agree that chronic absenteeism places students behind their peers and behind in their studies. I do not personally know a teacher or educator who would not agree with that!

State Superintendent Carey Wright suggests some of the problem lies with the fact that kindergarten is only mandatory for students enrolled in public kindergarten classrooms.  She feels the importance of Kindergarten should be more elevated.

She states… other means to address issues surrounding chronic absenteeism would be to expand public school (In-House?) Pre-K classrooms.

Question:

Pre-K in Mississippi is not mandatory for any child.

If Dr. Wright believes kindergarten is not valued by parents in Mississippi, what makes her believe attendance in new Pre-K public school settings would be any different?

Mississippi has adopted the Early Learning Collaborative Act.

MDE and Mississippi First are pushing for an increase in Phase I funding from $3 million to $6 million.

MDE has been consulting with (inexperienced) Mississippi First for the implementation of the Early Learning Collaborative Act.  Keep in mind Mississippi First (Rachel Canter) defined quality improvement measures for children in child care as a tool to identify centers that are sub par.  (Dr. Wright’s home state of Maryland defined QRIS as a means to recognize child care providers and centers for their accomplishments – quite a different attitude and demonstration of goodwill and professionalism!)

Furthermore, in Ms. Canter’s recently released and incomplete State of Public Pre-K Report Book, child care data was not even included.

The Mississippi First plan for Pre-K expansion Dr. Wright is touting recently scored seventh place out of nine and failed to be funded in a national competitive grant process.   A quick review of the Preschool Development Grant application submitted by MDE reveals only one private child care provider was included in the application’s development .  This representative was Ms. Lynn Black of Tupelo.  She is the person who also stood with Jill Dent in a former MDHS news conference supporting a method of payment to provide low-income parents with less child care assistance.  In fact, the payment suggested was lower than its current lowest rates in the entire nation!   This resulted in less reimbursement to providers for their services.  (Click here to read “Both center owners and DHS agreed those savings would come from cutting payments to centers.)

Soon after, MDE (Carey Wright) named Jill Dent as Director of the state’s Pre-K Collaborative Program … against the recommendation of child care provider groups. (It is a known fact that tuition fees determine level of classroom quality. The higher the fees collected, the higher the level of quality. The lower the fees collected, the less likely that provider will be able to provide the quality required to participate in a Pre-k Collaborative.) Clearly MDE does not understand or even consider the needs of child care centers and the hard work they provide to help children every day.

Finally, Senator Bryce Wiggins proposed a bill (luckily it failed) to create an interagency council through which MDE could work apart from the guidance of the State Early Childhood Advisory Council and perhaps, outside a make-up including representation of private child care providers. (The PEW Center for the States advises all stakeholders must come to the same table for successful Pre-K Collaboration and that at a minimum, collaborations involve school districts sub-contracting with qualified private providers to deliver a pre-k program. “Publicly funded pre-k can pose a threat to the viability of private providers by siphoning off a significant proportion of their pre-k enrollment to public schools. K-12 leaders need to be sensitive to these concerns and  communicate that one purpose of collaboration is to protect and preserve the community-based early childhood system.”)

The adverse attitude (impact) for child care demonstrated by State Superintendent Carey Wright (Rachel Canter) and MDE (Mississippi First) is not a stretch! In fact, some are convinced it comes perilously close to Disparate Treatment.

With regard to days absent, child care providers serving low-income children in districts with 32% poverty rates must report three consecutive days’ absence to DECCD and make contact with parents for an explanation as to why the children have not been in attendance. Perhaps a stretch from chronic absenteeism to Pre-K expansion would not have seemed so much so had the State Superintendent noted this reporting requirement for public opportunities for Pre-K in child care settings!

On December 18, 2014, Education Week reported Gilmore Foundation Pre-K Collaborator/Program insider and then member of the State Board of Education, Danny Spreitler as saying:

I honestly don’t think this is the time for us to be out here trying to figure out money, until we get our ducks in a row. We need to take this next year, 2015, and rather than look at massive expansion, we’ve got to get more reliable data on the programs that are working.” (Click here to read Mississippi Loses Out On Federal Pre-k Grant.)

The Education Week Report has also ranked Mississippi as number 9th in the nation for 3 and 4-year-old children attending preschool.  It would benefit the children of Mississippi if Dr. Wright would acknowledge the strength of Mississippi Childcare Workers and look at cost-effective ways of helping provide more funding for those children instead of creating another grade of Pre-K in the public schools.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


“Can we talk?” How About “Quality Implementation” of the Child Care Certificate Program?

“Can we talk?” How About “Quality Implementation” of the Child Care Certificate Program?

When the Certificate Program was taken from the Planning and Development Districts in 2012, support was split among providers because we did not know then what we know now…MDHS had already executed a contract with XEROX for e-childcare.

Regardless, the MDHS in-house administration of child care assistance distribution known as the Certificate Program demonstrated first steps in bringing an automated process online through the development of the ledger reimbursement system. Basically, the transition was a smooth one and MDHS should be commended for that.

However, the new statewide online process only for the child care assistance application and issuance of new Certificates and the process for the recent period of rollover – particularly the relentless Notices of Termination – have been and continue to be chaotic, very work intensive and incomplete.

Policy and system failures along with too little, if any, advance explanation from DECCD have left parents and providers in a lurch as to how to even proceed this academic year and have adversely impacted statewide work force support systems fueling local economic development, early learning and entry-level jobs in every community!

Forget Quality Stars for now – do you even know how many children age four you will be serving this school year?  Age three?  Can you even remotely finalize an overall school roster?

That is the important message providers have tried to convey when attending the recent MDHS Quality Road Shows.

That is the message MOST OFTEN SUPPRESSED by policy makers and the Quality funded when providers have attended Road Shows.

That is the most heavily weighted finding documented in the Q.R.I.S. research conducted by the Mississippi Low-Income Child Care Initiative which was recently released; LOW-INCOME PROVIDERS JUST CANNOT PROVIDE QUALITY WITHOUT ADEQUATE FUNDING AND CERTIFICATES, so, for them,  there is little reason to attend Road Shows or participate in quality initiatives at this time.

Most of the issues frustrating Mississippians, harming employability, denying access or limiting resource capacity are simply managerial.  Primarily, I have come to opine MDHS Case Managers are doing their best to process all families but are completely overwhelmed by what is being expected of them. I think it is very reasonable to conclude that one DECCD Case Manager may be trying desperately to complete the work-load formerly done by an entire Planning Development District Office of four to eight staff members. That work environment has only been exasperated further by sudden staff vacancies (DUH!) and new DHS hires unfamiliar with the work or with little experience and little time for DECCD to train them during the period of rollover!

MDHS had planned to outsource all of this to XEROX.   We objected to that and still do object to eventual, less child care assistance to parents as a “savings” to the state rather than continued (already insufficient) reimbursement of full-time fees for full-time slots to support rising, full-time operating costs supporting early learning.

Even still, what we are seeing now may be a glimpse of what customer service might have looked like through XEROX e-childcare…limited staff and diminished customer service for increased profits.

MDHS is asking for our input on the administration of the Certificate Program.

Please provide documentation of issues via email to MDHS – telephone calls to your assigned MDHS Case Managers often bring an unacceptable period of being placed on hold for up to forty-five minutes or longer and would further overwhelm Case Mangers already “buried” in messages.  Faxes are sent to a separate MDHS location, logged in and scanned before ever delivered to Case Managers and many are lost in the shuffle.  (You may also leave comments below.)

Encourage MDHS to fill all staff positions quickly, stay true to the CCDF State Plan and encourage Quality through “QUALITY Implementation” of the Child Care Certificate Program by clearly conveying to MDHS that automation and a paperless system will never eliminate the need for dedicated and sufficient MDHS employees any more than XEROX DID NOT eliminate the need for county eligibility workers determining SNAP benefits or county TANF Case Managers.

Mississippi does not save or fully prosper when there is no effort from MDHS to give up attitudes against welfare recipients and recognize child care assistance as an important local economic development tool in more ways than early learning for future success.  The Certificate Program is an economic development tool local employers and communities have come to rely on in the maintenance of a stable, productive, successful work force today!  The Certificate Program puts a “fair share” of chased federal dollars into each local economy today!  All socio-economic groups benefit from such local economic stimulus each and every day…today!

Therefore, MDHS Road Shows only touting quality technical services while suppressing needed public discussion of the problematic economic issues arising out of the current Certificate Program administration simply puts the “cart before the quality horse”. 

Forgive me for saying so, but it is a classic example of  “Nero fiddled while Rome burned.”

“Can we talk?” 

Yet bet we can! If not at a MDHS sponsored Road Show, we can talk here… starting with the late Joan Rivers (Phi Beta Kappa) and what she might have said of the current implementation:

Joan-Rivers-resized

Joan Rivers 1933-2014

“How many times can you go, ‘And the cow goes moo and the pig goes oink’? It’s like talking to a supermodel.”

 

“I succeeded by saying what everyone else is thinking.”

“Don’t follow any advice, no matter how good, until you feel as deeply in your spirit as you think in your mind that the counsel is wise.”

Some MDHS priority must be given to improving the management and implementation of the Child Care Certificate Program.

Talk to members of your local Chamber of Commerce.  I am sure they would agree.  Perhaps you can get them involved as well!

 

 


MLICCI to Present Findings of First Such QRIS Study in the Nation!

MLICCI_August_2nd

cwelchlin@mschildcare.org


Post of 7 Years Still Relevant in 2021: Little or No Recognized Child Care Leadership Appointments to SECAC

Post of 7 Years Still Relevant in 2021: Little or No Recognized Child Care Leadership Appointments to SECAC

The Definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

When we aired legitimate concerns to members of SECAC during a period of time which has revealed 97,000,000 dollars embezzled from programs serving low-income children and the MSDH failure to provide new enrollment for child care assistance for five consecutive years, NOT ONE member ever cared enough to reach out to us in concern.

In fact, SECAC members enabled the adoption of a quality program with the authority to eliminate our participation without ever requesting the rules – and there were none.  Not one member of SECAC – including the appointed representation of the child care industry – ever, ever questioned such violation of Administrative Procedures Law and Racial Discrimination as determined for Mississippi’s QRIS by the US Commission on Civil Rights.

As some SECAC members received their program funding and budgets as sub-grantees, they ignored Ethics rules and child care providers struggling to serve low-income children through the CCDF.

And here we go again.

We do not know how newly appointed child care providers were selected to represent us on SECAC. In fact, we do not even know who some of them are.

SECAC should take the lead from the Mississippi Department of Health Child Care Licensing Division.  When vacancies become available on the Child Care Advisory Board, all licensed providers are notified and invited to apply.

Mississippi will never thrive or address learning loss with the same leadership, however distributed now or with whatever agency they are with now, until state actors actually value and seek the best work of the most capable and involved child care provider leadership.

One More Time, y’all :

There is a rule in Mississippi Child Care: School aged children and entry-level toddlers may not co-exist.  You simply do not mix the babies in with the big kids on the playground, or someone may get hurt!

That is the health and safety measure provider members throughout the state had hoped for when the Mississippi Association of Licensed Child Care Providers successfully lobbied for positions of one licensed provider from each Congressional District to be appointed to the State Early Childhood Advisory Council as a requirement of the Early Learning Collaborative Act of 2013.

Among MALCCP child care providers (operating licensed child care) in positions of top leadership are an ivy league graduate WITH THE COVETED Early Childhood Degree who also studied and trained in the system where kindergarten began – Germany; another who has professionally evaluated the Q.R.I.S. (results soon to be released), worked to advance early learning curriculum in an east Mississippi school district and has been recognized nationally for work to empower low-income families; and a provider who serves on the Jackson State University Pre-K Planning Committee and the Pre-K Common Core Alignment Committee in Jackson Public Schools.

Such accomplished child care leaders also have experience opposing SECAC “Big Kids” such as: MDHS Executive Director Ricky Berry in the adoption of Xerox e-Childcare™ designed to pay less reimbursement (as a savings to the state) for the preschool environments low-income children attend; Child Care Licensing Supervisor Vickey Berryman in the re-measurements and maximum capacity reductions of Existing (old) child care facilities and alleged Constitutional violation of Due Process of Law; Allies and Excel by 5 in proposals to require poorly performing ITERS/ECERS ONLY (from which many such quasi-agencies around the SECAC table draw millions in CCDF funds to offer technical assistance) on licensed child care programs wishing to participate in Mississippi’s universal pre-school.

Unfortunately, peer vetted, strong representation of child care appears to be precisely the work early learning policy-makers continue to isolate.

LITTLE or No recognized child care leadership appointments were made to SECAC.

For our effort and to my knowledge, MALCCP leadership was not even invited to make recommendations as an organization for appointments to SECAC!

We are invited to give comment from the gallery…without a vote.

Have we been robbed of our work to have knowledgeable and highly visible child care leadership at the policy making table?

Was it the intent of legislators to lure our organization into a “false sense of security” that child care leadership would be invited to participate in the development and planning of early learning?

You need to ask your legislators to answer that question, but only time will truly tell.

For now, actions speak louder than words – we little Mississippi child care providers are at high risk of being trampled outside…some more.

Of course, if my goals might possibly include continued unfunded mandates and disproportionate “adverse impact” on licensed child care, I wouldn’t give practiced opposition a vote either!   🙂

No recess here!

We must continue to work for quality and equality in early learning through other venues.