Dear Editor:

Dear Editor:

In reference to Sunday’s Clarion-Ledger article, “Bill could break cycle of inaction on child care in Miss.”, I wish to say Mississippi has an Interagency Council for the coordination of agencies and services. It is called the State Early Childhood Advisory Council and was established in compliance with federal statute.

Senate Bill 2274 appears to be exactly as referenced by Petra Kay in the Clarion-Ledger – a struggle for “who will be in charge” of limited resources including the Child Care Development Block Grant.

Senator Wiggins’ bill does not address the unfunded mandate for child care providers to hold a B.S. Degree in Early Childhood in order to be deemed “a quality rated center” or the costs that would be passed along to parents as a result.

SB 2274 would either create more duplication of services or eliminate the Governor’s Early Learning Council (SECAC) and thus remove the large majority of stakeholders from the policy making table.

SB 2274 appears to be in support of a plan that was reviewed by national education experts twice, FAILED twice in the Race to the Top- Early Learning Challenges and did not secure the federal resources needed to implement the poorly rated plan. See CL article, December 10, 2014, “Mississippi misses out on federal preschool money – again”. http://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2014/12/10/mississippi-misses-federal-preschool-money/20194705/

This “crisis” has no real merit.

Debbie Ellis

Mississippi Association of Licensed Child Care Providers

Greenwood, MS


State Plan Final Hearing: Do You Feel Better Now?

State Plan Final Hearing: Do You Feel Better Now?

Do You Feel Better Now copy


How did The Hechinger Report Gain Information Contained in a Child Care Worker’s Personnel File for Publication?

How did The Hechinger Report  Gain Information Contained in a Child Care Worker's Personnel File for Publication?

Is this a preview of the touted (SB2274) Early Childhood Services Interagency Council “character” and does such conduct really validate increased funding for the Early Learning Collaborative?

Freedom of Information Act 

The Freedom Of Information Act intends to hold government accountable through transparency and gives the public an opportunity to monitor the functioning of their government.

The Hechinger Report and The Clarion-Ledger requested complaint and inspection reports for every licensed child care facility in District V, which spans a large part of Mississippi, including Jackson, Vicksburg and Yazoo City.

The Mississippi State Department of Health said it would cost $40 an hour to pay someone to pull the records, a fee that was reduced to roughly $20 per hour after The Hechinger Report filed a complaint with the Mississippi Ethics Commission.

Relevant public interest under the FOIA is “the citizens’ right to be informed about what their government is up to.”

Steering “High Quality” (QRIS) is Against the Interest Congress Intended in FOIA

On December 1-4, 2016, on the Facebook page of The Hechinger Report, reporters wrote:

“We want to hear from parents about their experiences finding safe, high quality places to leave their children…” (Click here.)

“Wanted to be sure that everyone knows we’ve got an inspection report from every child care center in the Mississippi Department of Health’s District Five (Claiborne, Cophia, Hinds, Madison, Rankin, Simpson, Sharkey-Issaquena, Warren and Yazoo counties.) Curious about how your center fared? We’re happy to share! Let us know what centers you’re interested in.”

FOIA Exemption 6: It is not enough that the information might aid the requester in lobbying efforts. Hypothetical public benefits cannot outweigh significant invasion of privacy.                                                     U.S. Department of Justice

A request for more information as to what was being released to the public yielded the following response from The Hechinger Report:

Nothing we have is confidential…We have copies of complaint reports that are marked substantiated or unsubstantiated but any reference of those complaints would say clearly if they were substantiated or unsubstantiated.”

Alleged Defamation

On January 31, 2016, The Hechinger Report and the Clarion-Ledger published “Mississippi child care in crisis: State’s weak oversight puts children in harm’s way”. It reveals investigations The Hechinger Report conducted at centers that may have been targeted based on the unsubstantiated complaints and identification of individuals disclosed and received in its FOIA request from the Mississippi State Department of Health.

In one case, although The Hechinger Report did not provide hospital records or lab results from the parent or anything that would hold up in a Court of Law verifying an infant had in fact been given juice or medicine that made him sick, it chastised the Mississippi State Department Health for insufficient investigation and/or for not substantiating that such an incident had indeed taken place.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that such a statement on the part of The Hechinger Report may be defamatory.

The Scoop – “We Want Absolute Power!”

On February 1, 2016, The Hechinger Report teased the question, “Who should fix problems with Mississippi’s early childhood system?”

It went on to report, “The Department of Health has the most control — it’s the only agency that can open or close a center and impose fines — yet there are holes in its monitoring process, according to advocates and legislators.

That narrow approach limits how effectively the state can monitor centers, said Cathy Grace, co-director of the Graduate Center for the Study of Early Learning at the University of Mississippi.

Some lawmakers have suggested the Department of Education should take a larger role in regulating centers.”

On February 2, 2016, Hechinger tweeted: “A few legislators have prioritized child care in Mississippi including @Brice Wiggins.”

§ 25-61-11  Personnel Files Not Public Record

On February 7, 2016, The Hechinger Report and The Clarion-Ledger published “Turnover, low pay may undermine child care in state”. On the same day Hallmark premiered “Kitten Bowl III” in support of shelter and rescue adoption, The Hechinger Report revealed the work history portion of a personnel file as follows:

“On a Wednesday morning in June 2014, xxxxxxxx, director of xxxxxxx Center sat in her office as a parent accused a worker of grabbing her son’s neck. The worker had been hired five months earlier, with no experience in child care. Her background included 10 months as a vet assistant, two months as a sales associate at an art gallery and one month at an animal shelter where she “took care of the cats,” according to records from the Department of Health’s Division of Child Care Licensure.

The point was to demonstrate that the accused had no former experience as a caregiver, a violation of the Regulations, and The Hechinger Report could have just said that but then, that might not have been adequate to be highly offensive to a reasonable person.

Instead, it set work at the Humane Society/shelter apart in dramatic quotations as though this employment is unworthy and allegedly violated both the Privacy Act and Mississippi Code which prohibits disclosure and release of personnel records or any part of such record in the agency’s possession. (Click here.)

Child Care Small Business Discrimination

February 8, 2016, child care providers held a news conference at the Capitol to announce a Mississippi Committee finding to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights of potential gender and race discrimination towards child care small businesses in Mississippi’s early learning system. The report listed recommendations to be considered that would improve quality for children in these environments without additional costs to this state!
 
Child Care Priority
Brice Wiggins did not attend.

 

Limiting the Pool of Talent!  Snubbing Most Stakeholders!

On February 9, 2016, Bill 2274, Education, was posted. The Bill seeks to establish full control of all financial resources and authority over all Programs for preschool aged children. It would eliminate the Governor’s State Early Childhood Advisory Council and with that, remove the following stakeholders from the early learning policy making table: child care providers from each Congressional District; Building Blocks, Excel by Five, The Center for Education Innovation, nSpark, Mississippi State Extension Service, and more.

 

LOL!
The Hechinger Report dutifully laid the groundwork for SB2274 and the one model takeover of all early learning (by the Pre-K Collaborative) last week espousing the following:
 “But many child care workers and advocates don’t trust the Department of Human Services. In 2012, the agency rolled out a controversial policy requiring all parents who receive child care assistance from the state to scan their fingerprints when picking up and dropping off children.”
 Is it possible that these investigative reporters do not know that the individual responsible for the large scale alienation of providers – through the purchase of the finger scanning payment system (designed to reduce the amount of child care assistance low-income parents received as a large savings to the agency) – Jill Dent, is now the Director of Early Childhood Education at MDE!  (Have I mentioned Rachel Canter?  Click here.) We would not trust our right to hold an operating license with MDE for sure!  LOL!

 

Stolen Joy!  Industry-Wide Demoralization! 
We might need “a home”, but feel the influence and interviews in the Hechinger series of articles and its very narrow collection of expertise, its report of a defunct opportunity (T.E.A.C.H.) and the touting of a twice failed plan (Race to the Top) have more than demonstrated the leadership child care providers would be subjected to under the proposed Early Childhood Services Interagency Council. We fear it might be as disproportionate and hateful as we believe the Hechinger Series to be thus far.

Adversity is the rule for child care and working families when law gives some state actors the upper hand, so we wisely prefer and support a balance of power. Technology and the State Early Childhood Advisory Council make that possible.

 

Sticking with SECAC!
Child care providers wish to have equal input at the policy making table at SECAC, the ONLY place where we have been welcomed.
We feel the research and work done through SECAC’s Blueprint for Early Education encompasses the genius, expertise, combined resources and sustainability necessary to affordably improve child outcomes in all Mississippi communities (benefitting all constituents) – not just a selected few. It is the least likely to cause controversy, the least likely to have a Disparate Impact and the least likely to supplant the embedded private child care industry. (Click here.)

So, we think we will keep our seats, and ask the Hechinger reporters to kindly have one.

Not Expendable!  Keep Mississippi Working

The private child care industry is Mississippi’s workforce support system and we congratulate Governor Bryant on the creation of 2,500 new jobs in Clinton!

 

The Legislature’s Oversight Agency –
PEER’s Objective Evaluation
The Joint Legislative Committee on Performance Evaluation and Expenditure Review of the Early Learning Collaborative (PEER: The Mississippi Legislature’s Oversight Agency) does not recommend increased funding or additional staff for the Pre-K Collaborative.
In an Executive Summary, PEER reports:
“MDE awarded funding to four collaboratives that utilized a prekindergarten curriculum found through rigorous research to have “no discernable effects” on student learning.
…after the first full year of implementation, prekindergarteners in the program’s participating collaboratives achieved the end-of-the-year target score on the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment less often than children enrolled in other public pre-kindergartens.”
I have just checked and you may check as well if you like – no desperate child care smear campaign has changed those findings.  (Click here.)
 
 
.
 
 

 

 

 

HECHINGER’S “CRISIS IN CHILD CARE” SMEAR CAMPAIGN IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY KELLOGG!

A child care press conference will be held on Monday, February 8, 2016, on the second floor of the Capitol at 10:00 AM.

HECHINGER’S “CRISIS IN CHILD CARE” SMEAR CAMPAIGN IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY KELLOGG!

The Hechinger Report knew the Mississippi Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights was investigating potential Disparate Impact in Mississippi’s child care quality rating system before publishing harmful, unsubstantiated child care complaints (that should not have been disclosed because Courts have ruled no public interest exists in unsubstantiated complaints) and expressed its disdain for Constitutional Due Process of Law in Sunday’s Clarion-Ledger – its partner.

Seems to me they may as well partner with the paparazzi and the National Inquirer!

Hechinger is funded by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation which is actively involved in the promotion and support of Mississippi’s Pre-K Collaborative and QRIS.

Up to now, it has seemed, particularly to self-employed child care providers, that the strategy (in Mississippi) of some Pre-K Collaborative supporters (including some media outlets, public policy groups and member organizations) may be to lift up their member programs (and gainful employment through associated grants) by disparaging self-employed child care providers (the majority of which are Black and/or women owned and operated Programs) through selective reporting, adverse policy, exclusion, and marginalization.

Perhaps the idea is to bully the citizenry and working parents, over time, into agreement that child care and time spent with us is not safe or where a child should be; only six hours of public Pre-K such that they would be funded to advise/provide/report can really meet a family’s work support and early learning needs.

And such strategy would be particularly necessary when Frank Porter Graham’s recent Evaluation of Mississippi’s very costly yet unavailing QRIS and measured child outcomes in the recent legislative review of the Pre-K Collaborative are scathing!

The Joint Legislative Committee on Performance Evaluation and Expenditure Review from PEER: The Mississippi Legislature’s Oversight Agency, is the only external Early Learning Collaborative evaluation available to legislators because:

  • there is no child care regulatory oversight for Pre-K classrooms such as is required in other states;
  • there is no QRIS classroom requirement such as is required for Pre-K classrooms in other states so Mississippi cannot compare Pre-K “quality”;
  • the physical standards as governed by the Early Learning Guidelines are less stringent for existing Mississippi Pre-K classrooms than they are for child care classrooms and standards have recently been weakened for new construction through July 2017.

The report does not recommend increased funding or additional staff for Pre-K.

Click here to read more.

A child care press conference will be held on Monday, February 8, 2016, on the second floor of the Capitol at 10:00 AM.

This is your opportunity to unite as the small business child care industry and present the facts.

Stand up for your small business!

Come stand with us!

A message from Carol Burnet of MLICCI:

Dear Friends of Child Care,
You may have read The Hechinger Report articles in the 1/30 issue of the Clarion Ledger. If you did, you probably feel accused of harming the wellbeing of the children enrolled in your center. We are angry that the Clarion Ledger and the Hechinger Report teamed up to promulgate such accusations that harm centers like yours that do everything possible to support children and families. We want you to know that you are doing great work on behalf of your children and families, and we know that you do this work against great odds. Instead of being insulted in the state newspaper, you should be heralded as champions for our state’s low-income working families.
This type of cheap shot gets thrown at child care periodically. For example, a couple of years ago there was a terrible article in the New Republic entitled, “The Hell of American Day Care.” I wrote a response that ran in The Nation and on the Bill Moyers national blog. You can read it here. So this diversionary tactic is not new. Unfortunately, it takes the focus off the need to finance the system we all “say” we want while at the same time tarnishing all the terrific child care champions like you and making low-income working parents feel terrible about using the child care they need. This is not a helpful contribution to the many challenges we face in Mississippi about child care. We have been standing up for child care centers a very long time, and we will continue to do that. We know what a difference you make in the lives of low-income working families and we are grateful to you.
If Hechinger and the Clarion Ledger wanted to be helpful, they would be honest, not diversionary, and promote more funding for child care services to build the system. Articles like this “say” they want to see that more low-income children can be served and more centers can afford to operate and hire staff with early childhood training and equip learning centers. Everyone likes to beat up on child care while starving child care for resources. Our nation and our state have shrunk the number of children served in the child care subsidy program to a 15-year low. To pretend this is about anything other than the nation’s failure  to finance the kind of system everyone pretends to want is just that – pretending.
Help us push Mississippi to build the robust child care system we all know families need. And thanks for all you do for Mississippi’s low-income working families!
Carol Burnett, Executive Director
MS Low Income Child Care Initiative
Child Care Matters.
See what’s happening on our social sites
 
 
MS Low-Income Child Care Initiative | 204 Walker Street | Biloxi, MS | MS | 39533

 

 

 

 


CHILD CARE PRESS CONFERENCE MONDAY! ATTEND!!

CHILD CARE
PRESS CONFERENCE
MONDAY
FEBRUARY 8, 2016
CAPITOL
SECOND FLOOR
10:00 AM
LET’S BE FAIR!!
If you feel you have been excluded or treated unfairly by QRIS QUALITY STARS or feel this state would be BETTER SERVED by reassigning funding now earmarked for QUALITY STARS (dismal performance ten years on-click here) and SAVE THE CHILDREN (Head Start has its own source of federal funding) to the Mississippi State Department of Health in order to give the Department the tools it needs for better enforcement of the Regulations as well as to ensure the continued expert training (such as the very popular hand washing classes) provided by MSDH, you need to attend.  THE SAFETY OF ALL CHILDREN MUST BE GIVEN FIRST PRIORITY – OUR CCDBG QUALITY RESOURCES ARE LIMITED BUT THEY MAY BE SPENT IN THIS WAY AND STILL MEET THE FEDERAL BLOCK GRANT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS!  Let’s get this into the CCDBG State Plan! :-)
 
A LARGE GROUP OF PROVIDERS WILL SEND A STRONG MESSAGE OF OUR CONCERNS TO OUR LEGISLATORS!
NO EXCUSES FOR YOUR ABSENCE ACCEPTED! SEND A REPRESENTATIVE!
SUPPORT THE EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN FOR YOU, FOR THE CHILDREN YOU SERVE, FOR YOUR BUSINESS INVESTMENT, FOR MISSISSIPPI!
MAKE ARRANGEMENTS
AND STAND WITH US!  REPRESENT CHILD CARE!
A purple Child Care Matters t-shirt will be provided to you by MLICCI.

Providers Overwhelmingly Reject MS QRIS. DECCD Continues. Who is in Charge?

Millions and Millions copy

Click here: QRIS Rating Systems Do Not Improve Learning or Social Development for Children

Click here: Child-Care Rating Systems Earn Few Stars in Study. Tool said to fall short in predicting quality.

Click here: “Evaluation of Mississippi Child Care Quality Stars Program” (Pages 35-36).


Wanted: Copy of Mississippi’s 2015 Quality Needs Assessment

state legislatures copy

Click here for more on 2014 CCDBG Reauthorization Act.

Click here for definition of Central Planning.


Ignorance or Arrogance? The DECCD 2016 CCDBG State Plan Work

2016 State Plan Work 2 copy

UPDATE: CENTRAL PLANNERS AWARD CCDBG FUNDING CONTRACTS WITHOUT CONDUCTING REQUIRED QUALITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

The Early Years Network contract was awarded to a single agency who serves as the fiscal agent.  This agency works with other agency partners to provide high quality services.

Contract Awardee: Mississippi State Universtiy Extension Service
Contract Partners
(alphabetical order):
Mississippi Center for Education Innovation
Mississippi State University Early Childhood Institute
 NEW FUNDING Save the Children  (Head Start)
 NEW FUNDING University of Mississippi Center for Education Research and Evaluation
University of Southern Mississippi
Department of Child and Family Studies
Institute for Disability Studies

Visit: http://www.mdhs.state.ms.us/early-childhood-care-development/child-care-resources/quality-enhancement/the-early-years-network/  

FACT :

Since DECCD took the Certificate Program In-House, approximately 250 Licensed Child Care Facilities have gone out of business.  It has not yet been determined if a disproportionate number of those failed businesses were owned and operated by members of a protected class.  However, no or few Certificates funding newly enrolled children have been issued by DECCD this fiscal year which began Oct. 1, 2015, (citing lack of funding) so the number of failed businesses serving large numbers of low-income children is expected to rise due to the fact Low-income Providers have not been able to fill vacancies left when children began the new school year last August or aged out of the Program.

Webinar Questions and Answers:

http: //www.mdhs.ms.gov/media/318009/Webinar-1_Questions-and-Polls.pdf

Q: What document will be provided in advance as a basis for development? Anything other than the 2013 Plan?

A: DECCD will not release a draft of the State Plan until such time as the Office of Child Care releases a final version of the State Plan Preprint.

http://www.mdhs.ms.gov/media/318968/Webinar-3_comments.pdf

Question: Is it also the consideration of state policy makers to reduce the assistance such low-income families now receive in order to attempt to serve the same number of children while increasing grants for quality? If so, will you be providing an Economic Impact Statement?

DECCD Response: States have been required by the 2014 Reauthorization to make greater investments in quality activities and program oversight processes such as monitoring providers. At this time, the state’s allocation of funds has not increased. DECCD will make every effort to judiciously allocate limited resources in order to comply with federal regulations and to meet the needs of our clients.

Any future policy changes proposed by DECCD will be presented to the Attorney General’s Office for review. DECCD will follow the instructions provided by legal counsel regarding program performance and the requirement of any Economic Impact Statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Online Market Rate Survey Due January 18, 2016 (See your Email In-Box.)

Online Market Rate Survey Due January 18, 2016   (See your Email In-Box.)

The scope of the current Market Rate Survey has been increased to account for not only market rate, but also provider cost.

DECCD has added a section to the Market Rate Survey to collect information regarding costs incurred by the provider for the provision of child care. 

Given provider feedback, DECCD now rightly suspects that many providers set their rates based on subsidy reimbursement rather than the actual costs of providing care. Therefore, DECCD designed the Market Rate Survey to include two very distinct sections.

The first section captures market rate information and WE FEEL SHOULD BE THE ONLY SECTION in a MARKET RATE SURVEY.

The second section is an additional optional page that captures provider costs information and one WE FEEL SHOULD BE A SEPARATE COSTS ANALYSIS SURVEY if designed to collect data other than market rates.

But for notice of a “Market Rate Survey”, DECCD has not convincingly explained its reason for wishing to conduct costs analyses, but it is not necessarily a bad thing.

In geographic areas of Extreme Poverty such as the Delta, the very low reimbursement rates paid by DECCD (the lowest in the state) may not cover the actual costs of providing proper care, let alone “high quality early learning environments”.  So the Administration for Children and Families has allowed alternative “costs analysis” to be conducted to better ensure equal access and more equitable resources to all providers throughout the state. The alternative information gathered in Part II could enable DECCD to set higher rates in the Delta than the geographic Market Rate Survey (Part I) process now allows.

The Problems:

HHS Psychobabble – The Administration for Children and Families has placed DECCD in an impossible situation with this unfunded mandate: DECCD is required to increase reimbursements from current 2004 Market Rates to no less than 2014 Market Rates and serve the same number of children… without any increase in CCDBG funding…(wait for it)…“to the extent that is possible”!  (LOL)  Psychobabble!

History – Providers feel recent past Market Rate Survey data has been manipulated by CCDBG funded sub-grantees conducting the collection of data to reflect a much greater percentage of market rates paid to providers than was actually so.

Providers believe CCDBG Funded sub-grantees did not weight or rule out the majority of surveys, most of which were completed by low-income providers that could not even report a market rate! (The DECCD CERTIFICATE VALUE IS NOT A MARKET RATE but rather, is only a percentage of a Market Rate. The market rate (price of care) is the fee per child paid by non-subsidized families for child care services!)

Given that sub-grantee conduct, it is difficult now for providers to work so intimately (to provide personally identifiable financial data) with those same people or to have faith in their knowledge and application of valid survey processes to combine two completely different sets of data for one outcome. 

Conflict of Interests -A CCDBG Quality set aside for expanded infant and toddler care (a current CCDBG Quality option) could help the lead agency to increase the rates while also helping to better maintain the current number of children served, but we do not feel we are likely to hear that recommendation from policy making sub-grantees positioned by DECCD to influence consideration of an award of a still greater percentage of CCDBG Quality funding to support their programs.  (Illinois, California and Louisiana sometimes issue a RFP for an outside, private business to conduct their states’ Market Rate Surveys!)

Accountability – The CCDBG requirement to conduct a Valid Quality Needs Assessment to identify and follow the will of the people in how millions and millions of quality dollars are to be spent in Mississippi’s 2016 State Plan (which involves the Market Rate Survey and the final determination of provider rates) has not even been mentioned, whispered, disclosed or completed by DECCD.

Psychological Prompts – Due to a provider’s Constitutional Right to Privacy, Part II of the “Rate Setting Tool” is  OPTIONAL.  You do not have to complete Part II to submit your Market Rate Data, BUT YOU WOULDN’T INITIALLY GUESS THAT BASED ON THE LANGUAGE USED BY DECCD THAT IMMEDIATELY EXCLAIMS AT THE END OF PART I:

“THIS SURVEY IS NOT COMPLETE.”

Such a declaration may be just enough to prevent providers serving middle to upper-income families (who are the only providers who can define the going child care rates) from submitting anything.

Only those who read further will see Part II is not required for submission.

Middle and upper-income providers have no incentive to participate in this process anyway and concerned provider groups have been given no guarantee that County Extension Field Representatives will visit middle and upper-income providers (with whom Extension Field Representatives likely have a professional/training relationship) in order to personally collect the appropriate market rate data (as we have suggested they might do).

Market Rate Surveys are Due January 18, 2016.

Providers may complete the online survey by clicking here:

https://msudafvm.co1.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_bNm7Kua5xFm3ey9

Participate as you see fit.


US Commission on Civil Rights Meets Today: Is Mississippi’s QRIS effectively a Tool to Screen a Protected Group Out?

US Commission on Civil Rights Meets Today: Is Mississippi’s *QRIS effectively a Tool to Exclude a Disproportionate Number of a Protected Group from Top Tier Quality Bonuses and Pre-School Participation?

Open Meeting     Thursday     2 PM Central    

Call 888-505-4369   Give ID #4796911

Public Comment Period at the End

Disparate impact is a way to prove racial discrimination based on the effect of a policy or practice rather than the intent behind it.

For example, requiring all applicants for promotion (**or a reasonable increase from a percentage of 2007 market rates only through top tier quality bonus payments) to receive a certain score on a standardized test (or QRIS Evaluation) could adversely affect candidates of color.

Objective criteria, such as tests, evaluations, degree requirements, and physical requirements may be challenged under a disparate impact theory.

These cases rely heavily on statistics, published statements, data, and number crunching, which require assistance from experts and attorneys.

As an example, providers offer these statements to demonstrate potential intent to screen out and exclude a disproportionate number of people and minority owned small businesses through Mississippi’s Quality Stars:

“The QCCSS is an important step in identifying subpar centers, though the rating system does not directly measure child learning.”

Mississippi First- Leaving Last in Line

     Rachel Canter, Executive Director

 

“STAND YOUR GROUND LEGISLATORS, DON’T GIVE IN TO THOSE WHO WILL WHINE AND MOAN ABOUT HOW HARD THIS WILL BE ON SOME CENTERS. THEY NEED TO BE CLOSED AND REPLACED WITH ‘QUALITY’ OPERATIONS, NOT JUST SITES THAT MAKE A PROFIT FOR THE OWNER.”

Gulflive.com

education1st

Over a period of several months, the Mississippi Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights has heard testimony and received information upon which it has based the final draft of an Advisory Memorandum of Recommendations to Congress which address potential racial discrimination in the administration of the Child Care Development Fund in Mississippi. (Click here.)

In addition to requested redress of Mississippi’s QRIS, the Committee’s findings state, “a number of African-American child care facility owners continue to view at least some of the state’s administration of CCDF as intentionally discriminatory on the basis of race. In the example of the ***electronic finger scanning initiative, the state maintains the program purpose was to address fraud. Some providers however, saw it is as an unnecessary barrier intended to withdraw support from communities deemed unworthy.”

“Furthermore, shortly after the program’s cancellation, the MDHS announced that all TANF workplace participants, who had previously been working in child care facilities across the state, would be removed and placed at ****alternative work sites because child care providers were not hiring them when they had completed six months of workplace job training. Many child care providers however, saw the move as direct retaliation for their resistance to the finger scanning initiative.”

The Committee will meet today to agree upon its final draft Advisory Memorandum, Thursday, November 19th at 2pm Central time. All Committee meetings are open to the public. If you wish to address the Committee directly you may join the call by dialing 888-505-4369 and providing the conference ID 4796911. A public comment period will be observed at the end of the meeting.

Melissa Wojnaroski, Civil Rights Analyst with the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Midwest Regional Office in Chicago, has announced it is possible that the U.S. Office of Civil Rights Enforcement will conduct further, more extensive investigations of potential Civil Rights violations following the submission of the Mississippi Committee’s work.


* ” Child-Care Rating Systems Earn Few Stars in Study” – Ed Week (click here); “QRIS Rating Systems Do Not Improve Learning or Social Development for Children” – Rand study (click here).

**According to the MLICCI, base reimbursement rates for providers through the CCDF program are already low— approximately 60 percent below Mississippi’s market rate. As such, many providers who depend on these funds cannot afford to make the necessary improvements to achieve higher rating.

*** The Xerox e-Childcare finger scan method of payment was proposed by Jill Dent who served at that time as the DECCD Director at MSDH.  Regardless of her highly contested proposal/policies/ideology being defeated in State Court, Jill Dent was appointed and now serves as Director of the Department of Education’s Pre-K Collaborative which requires QRIS participation among child care providers and costly maintenance of mid to upper tier quality scores.

**** Newly developed alternative TANF work sites (post State Court) include new placements in Head Start Programs (also licensed for child care) even though it is most likely that participating Head Start Programs CANNOT hire the TANF workplace participants as teacher-aides unless or until the TANF workplace participants complete 12 units of college coursework or CDA classes to meet Head Start employment requirements.    Adversely impacted child care providers (including those who formerly hired TANF workplace participants) note Head Start is not funded by the Child Care Development Fund and therefore, Head Start programs are now favored by MSDH because they were not involved in public opposition to the proposed Xerox e-Childcare finger scan method of payment.