Wanted: Copy of Mississippi’s 2015 Quality Needs Assessment

state legislatures copy

Click here for more on 2014 CCDBG Reauthorization Act.

Click here for definition of Central Planning.


Ignorance or Arrogance? The DECCD 2016 CCDBG State Plan Work

2016 State Plan Work 2 copy

UPDATE: CENTRAL PLANNERS AWARD CCDBG FUNDING CONTRACTS WITHOUT CONDUCTING REQUIRED QUALITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT

The Early Years Network contract was awarded to a single agency who serves as the fiscal agent.  This agency works with other agency partners to provide high quality services.

Contract Awardee: Mississippi State Universtiy Extension Service
Contract Partners
(alphabetical order):
Mississippi Center for Education Innovation
Mississippi State University Early Childhood Institute
 NEW FUNDING Save the Children  (Head Start)
 NEW FUNDING University of Mississippi Center for Education Research and Evaluation
University of Southern Mississippi
Department of Child and Family Studies
Institute for Disability Studies

Visit: http://www.mdhs.state.ms.us/early-childhood-care-development/child-care-resources/quality-enhancement/the-early-years-network/  

FACT :

Since DECCD took the Certificate Program In-House, approximately 250 Licensed Child Care Facilities have gone out of business.  It has not yet been determined if a disproportionate number of those failed businesses were owned and operated by members of a protected class.  However, no or few Certificates funding newly enrolled children have been issued by DECCD this fiscal year which began Oct. 1, 2015, (citing lack of funding) so the number of failed businesses serving large numbers of low-income children is expected to rise due to the fact Low-income Providers have not been able to fill vacancies left when children began the new school year last August or aged out of the Program.

Webinar Questions and Answers:

http: //www.mdhs.ms.gov/media/318009/Webinar-1_Questions-and-Polls.pdf

Q: What document will be provided in advance as a basis for development? Anything other than the 2013 Plan?

A: DECCD will not release a draft of the State Plan until such time as the Office of Child Care releases a final version of the State Plan Preprint.

http://www.mdhs.ms.gov/media/318968/Webinar-3_comments.pdf

Question: Is it also the consideration of state policy makers to reduce the assistance such low-income families now receive in order to attempt to serve the same number of children while increasing grants for quality? If so, will you be providing an Economic Impact Statement?

DECCD Response: States have been required by the 2014 Reauthorization to make greater investments in quality activities and program oversight processes such as monitoring providers. At this time, the state’s allocation of funds has not increased. DECCD will make every effort to judiciously allocate limited resources in order to comply with federal regulations and to meet the needs of our clients.

Any future policy changes proposed by DECCD will be presented to the Attorney General’s Office for review. DECCD will follow the instructions provided by legal counsel regarding program performance and the requirement of any Economic Impact Statement.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Operation Rock the Phone for SB 2477

Facebook SB 2477 copy


URGENT: Xerox e-Childcare™ Public Hearing Wednesday!

echildcare public hearings copy

Click Here To Read the Only Public Notice and Short Form Economic Impact Statement.


Update: Re-measurements & Reduction in Licensed Maximum Capacity

Update - Remeasurements 2 copy

The “clarification” of the enforcement of maximum capacity of each room for all existing businesses – adopted in July 2013 by the Board of Health – was meant to “make good” an agency practice that began years ago as an internal only Child Care Licensing Bureau application .

It was and has never been a lawfully and openly adopted regulation. 

In 2009, a “fine” was the only language inserted into the final adoption of the regulations for a violation of the internal application enforcing maximum capacity by room, but the “fine language” or practice applied was never disclosed in advance of the public hearings of the 2009 proposed amendments, no economic impact statement was ever provided and it was not disclosed to the Secretary of State.

It is likely some licensing officials in some counties, adhering only to written regulations, did not enforce the internal application of maximum capacity by room until just recently, and when they did, the “new application” of fines levied against long existing businesses for exceeding the maximum capacity of a room absent violations in adult-child ratios – raised immediate questions.

Perhaps that is what triggered the recent need for Child Care Licensure Bureau staff to add to the 2013  proposed regulations what has now become an actual “new rule adoption” for the enforcement of maximum capacity by room which the Licensure staff have explained to the Council and BOH as mere “clarification only”.

The stealth adoption, which I questioned, prompted Council member Judy Prine to request additional information from providers and make a commitment to look deeper into the issue.

In the meantime, I have asked for the “maximum capacity by room clarification” to be rescinded altogether, for that is enforcement of the most stringent and costly square footage standard in the nation in a state receiving the lowest child care fees – not to mention it was not properly adopted.

I have also requested that the Council provide full disclosure of the 50 square feet per child rule (and not 35 sq. ft. as published) which has been long required in actual practice and utilized by licensure staff in the agency’s ongoing conduct of re-measuring and reducing licensed maximum capacity for existing businesses.

These matters may be taken up in old business at Friday’s Child Care Advisory Council.

Please make every effort to attend.

(Click here for full story.)

Child Care Facilities Licensure

Child Care Advisory Council

1:00 P.M., October 18, 2013

Waggoner Building

143B Lefleurs Square

Jackson, MS  39211


HYPOCRISY – Enforcement Before Filings and Public Hearing!

                                                                                                                                               

Information was released to Xerox – without our knowledge – in order for Xerox – NOT MDHS – to send us information concerning the rules of the newly proposed echildcare system.

As we speak, Xerox is now telephoning licensed providers “as a courtesy” to remind us to submit contracts.

Contracts from Xerox include a warning on bright pink paper informing that if we do not submit adverse contracts ASAP, we MAY NOT GET PAID IN A TIMELY FASHION.

Some ALLIES employees, citing their funding from DHS, reiterated and also informed that centers participating in ALLIES programs were expected to PILOT the finger scan equipment or face possible delay in provider reimbursement payments. Many who signed the Xerox contracts felt coerced into compliance as a result of ALLIES Program participation.

September 20th, via email, licensed providers in Regions I & II were provided instructions from Jill Dent on required echildcare trainings for providers scheduled before October 10, 2012.

All of this…prior to any study from the PILOT and prior to the public hearing that had to be requested from providers and legislators to be provided in the first place!

This is not the first time Jill Dent has circumvented the law, apparently with the full blessing of other SECAC members who serve to review and approve Child Care Policy Manuals and CCDF State Plan amendments and proposals.

A suit filed last December by Planning and Development Districts for Breach of Contract suggests that Administration Procedure Law is but a mere nuisance in procedure for MDHS as their intentions are already being carried out.

In this case of this proposed echildcare system, an opinion has been or is planned to be requested by Senator Albert Butler from Attorney General Jim Hood as to the legality of such enforcement.

Contract deadlines and calls from Xerox should be moved back to 30 days after the public hearing is held…considering democratic rule might actually affect the outcome.

In the meantime, if you wish to make a decision as to your submission for adverse contracts to Xerox prior to the public hearing or how failure to comply with rogue agency action might affect the children now in your care and the assignment of their Certificates to CCPP approved providers on October 1, 2012, contact Attorney General Jim Hood at the following number:

Office of the Attorney General         (601) 359-3680.

If he can take issue with Governor Haley Barbour’s “narrowly timed” Public Notice for pardons, he can take issue with this much more serious violation in Administrative Procedures Law!


Pack-N-Plays Why Restrict Them?

I am posting this concern as submitted by a licensed provider.

If you have the rationale for restricting this item from nap time use, please reply.

Thanks!

Hello, I was reading over the proposals and there was something that I saw that really do no understand why they would put it in effect.

I saw where they are going to cut the use of pack-n-plays for rest periods.

In our daycare center we use pack-n-plays for our one year to 2 year old children because they are to big for a crib but really to small to sleep on a mat.

There are no choking or suffocation hazards in the pack-n-play and the caregiver is right there with them at all times.

Can you explain to me a little more in detail why they would change this.

Graco - Pack 'n Play Playard, Twister
 


ALABAMA TRANSPARENCY ROCKS!

Way to go Alabama!

For years I have enjoyed the level of subsidy transparency on the Alabama DHS website. (I do not know why the information is only available through February 2012 this fiscal year and hope that there has not been a change in Director.)

Regardless, this is the basis of my November 2011 Capitol level hearing request presented to Dr. Jill Dent asking that she post our subsidy statistics on-line, county-by-county, by type of care and include the county waiting lists.

She agreed to consider it and with the new E-Ledgers, this should be something that she could begin to do today.

In addition, we also should request written policy explaining how each county’s waiting list is being processed in order to guarantee that parents are being served on a first come, first serve basis and that smaller counties are not being swallowed up by large counties so that we may fairly maintain previously funded amounts per Planning & Development District. 

Please review the sample to follow. If you agree that Mississippi should have similar subsidy transparency,  request this of Dr. Dent in a letter of encouragement addressed to her at jill.dent@mdhs.ms.gov and register your vote on our poll!


Alabama Subsidized Child Care Statistics


Get the Picture? Quality Stars and Mississippi’s Consumer Protection Law

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-24-5: “…the following unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive trade practices or acts in the conduct of any trade or commerce are hereby prohibited:

(e) Representing that goods or services have sponsorship, approval, characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, or quantities that they do not have…

(h) Disparaging the goods, services, or business of another by false or misleading representation of fact…”

Now that you’ve seen the law and seen the new Quality Stars brochure DECCD created to help parents find quality [sic] child care, do you get the picture?

DECCD is deliberately engaging in deceptive trade practices designed to intimidate child care providers into participating in the State’s flawed Quality Rating System.

Will Attorney General Jim Hood insist DECCD-DHS follow the law?

§ 75-24-9. Injunction to restrain or prevent violation: “Whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that any person is using, has used, or is about to use any method, act or practice prohibited by Section 75-24-5, and that proceedings would be in the public interest, he may bring an action in the name of the state against such person to restrain by temporary or permanent injunction the use of such method, act or practice…”

Contact him and ask – and, while you’re asking, you might want to contact the Governor as well. Read the rest of this entry »