Double Standard

 

Sunday's Devotional

Click on this link to identify your Senator! Just enter your zip code!


SB 2477 PASSED as Amended

 SB 2477 PASSED as Amended

SB 2477 PASSED copy

Click here to read SB 2477 Committee Substitute.

Click here to read SB 2477 as Amended and Passed.


Operation Rock the Phone for SB 2477

Facebook SB 2477 copy


Just In Time! Yes! to Senate Bill 2477

Just in Time copyThe Mississippi Child Care Licensing Bureau has demonstrated a pattern and practice of proposing and adopting National Health and Safety Performance Standards with or without full disclosure all the while imposing them on existing businesses.

Click here to review the most recent Standard 5.1.2.1: Space Required per Child.


NEWS FLASH! Call Your Senator Today!

Child_Care_Bill copy

Click here to read full text of Senate Bill 2477.

Click here to read full text of Senate Bill 2562.


Honesty and Fairness should always be the governing rule! Miss. Space Requirement is About 50 sq. ft. Per Child!

Honesty and Fairness should always be the governing rule! Miss. Space Requirement is About 50 sq. ft. Per Child!

At the Child Care Advisory Council meeting held last Friday, October 18, 2013, MDH Licensure Staff member Festus Simkins reported to Council members that he didn’t know where this notion of 50 square feet per child came from.

That was not a truthful statement.

I refreshed his memory.

In 2000 – 2001, I had an administrative hearing for two reductions in maximum capacity that MDH Attorney Ellen O’Neal, Festus Simkins and others participated in.  Although the newly required 50 square feet per child was not disclosed to me or my attorney during the course of that hearing, questions posed to me by MDH attorneys were suspect.

“When your licensed maximum capacity was first determined in 1986, was furniture in the facility?”

Following that meeting, I googled “square footage in child care and furniture” and discovered National Health and Safety: Caring for Our Children, First Edition, STANDARD 5.112 SPACE REQUIRED PER CHILD.

STANDARD                                                                                                                                             The designated areas for children’s activities shall contain a minimum of 35 square feet per child, 50 square feet measured on the inside, wall to wall dimensions. The spaces are exclusive of food preparation areas of the kitchen, bathrooms, toilets, areas for the care of ill children, offices, staff rooms, corridors, hallways, stairways, closets, lockers, laundry, furnace rooms, cabinets, and storage shelving spaces.

COMMENTS                                                                                                                                          The 35 square feet of available play space per child should be free of furniture and equipment. With a usual furnishing load, this space usually amounts to 50 square feet measured wall to wall.

I lost my administrative hearing because I did not have that information in a timely fashion. (I have been reduced in earning capacity and licensed maximum capacity by 11 children for more than 12 years now.)

Therefore, I attended what I call the 2001 planned, “make it right public hearing” to amend the Regulations Governing Child Care by proposing to allow MDH to ‘re-measure’ existing child care facilities by current standards at any time at the discretion of the licensing agency.

In the presence of Mr. Simkins, BOH member Dr. Ray Foxworth and others, I objected and revealed the exact language and explanation of 50 square feet per child that Mr. Simkins had failed to provide.

Dr, Foxworth responded, “We can’t do that.”

Mr. Simkins responded, “We could just go ahead and say 50 square feet.”

Dr. Foxworth concluded, “No!  We can’t require that.”

For some reason, approval granting MDH licensing staff the authority to apply the new square footage requirement of 50 square feet per child to existing businesses was adopted anyway without benefit of an Economic Impact Statement or explanation of its effect.

Child Care providers have a right to know the truth in space requirements – particularly those opting to participate in a pre-kindergarten collaborative.

It is the exact standard applied by the Mississippi Department of Education governing NEW CONSTRUCTION of Mississippi pre-kindergarten classrooms that Mr. Simkins reviewed.

Developers, architects and bankers should know!  In fact, it could even be said that the failure of MDH to reveal the whole truth of 50 square feet per child has resulted in denying many children the value of a “high quality” environment in new construction from the time the true impact of the enforcement – 50 square feet per child – was concealed.

The Child Care Advisory Council and Board of Health should be aware of the MDH alleged practice of adverse “re-measurement” regulations adoptions for existing businesses through alleged ongoing failure to follow Administrative Procedures Law and should not be influenced only by “licensing staff pontificating” or duped into giving approval for continued alleged misuse of authority such as we may have recently seen in the adoption of the clarification only” of “maximum capacity per classroom” and accessed fines to providers for violation of said regulation…which does not exist.

Honesty and Fairness should always be the governing rule!

I am thankful to Council members Judy Prine and Deloris Suel for hearing my comments to the Council without prejudice and as a result, raising the questions needed.

There should be and always should have been a grandfather clause.

The “maximum capacity of a room” for existing businesses should be rescinded.

The total square footage needed to provide a reliable licensed maximum capacity should be revealed and put into clear, concise language in the Regulations Governing Child Care by age group.

I choose No Tricks for me or you during this Halloween season!

If you would like to learn more, click here and review the National Health and Safety: Caring for Our Children, Second Edition.

See page 257 to review the Standard governing Space Required Per Child and download for your records.

Click here to Learn more about Mississippi’s Early Learning Guidelines governing the Space Required Per Child in existing structures in public schools,  (20 children in a total of 600 square feet shared with furnishings and equipment).

See page 13,   4.0 Physical Settings for Existing Structures.

Compare the difference.


Update: Re-measurements & Reduction in Licensed Maximum Capacity

Update - Remeasurements 2 copy

The “clarification” of the enforcement of maximum capacity of each room for all existing businesses – adopted in July 2013 by the Board of Health – was meant to “make good” an agency practice that began years ago as an internal only Child Care Licensing Bureau application .

It was and has never been a lawfully and openly adopted regulation. 

In 2009, a “fine” was the only language inserted into the final adoption of the regulations for a violation of the internal application enforcing maximum capacity by room, but the “fine language” or practice applied was never disclosed in advance of the public hearings of the 2009 proposed amendments, no economic impact statement was ever provided and it was not disclosed to the Secretary of State.

It is likely some licensing officials in some counties, adhering only to written regulations, did not enforce the internal application of maximum capacity by room until just recently, and when they did, the “new application” of fines levied against long existing businesses for exceeding the maximum capacity of a room absent violations in adult-child ratios – raised immediate questions.

Perhaps that is what triggered the recent need for Child Care Licensure Bureau staff to add to the 2013  proposed regulations what has now become an actual “new rule adoption” for the enforcement of maximum capacity by room which the Licensure staff have explained to the Council and BOH as mere “clarification only”.

The stealth adoption, which I questioned, prompted Council member Judy Prine to request additional information from providers and make a commitment to look deeper into the issue.

In the meantime, I have asked for the “maximum capacity by room clarification” to be rescinded altogether, for that is enforcement of the most stringent and costly square footage standard in the nation in a state receiving the lowest child care fees – not to mention it was not properly adopted.

I have also requested that the Council provide full disclosure of the 50 square feet per child rule (and not 35 sq. ft. as published) which has been long required in actual practice and utilized by licensure staff in the agency’s ongoing conduct of re-measuring and reducing licensed maximum capacity for existing businesses.

These matters may be taken up in old business at Friday’s Child Care Advisory Council.

Please make every effort to attend.

(Click here for full story.)

Child Care Facilities Licensure

Child Care Advisory Council

1:00 P.M., October 18, 2013

Waggoner Building

143B Lefleurs Square

Jackson, MS  39211


Flouting Law with Impunity?

Flouting Law with Impunity?

Agency Division Directors proposing Significant Amendments to a set of regulations should be required by the legislature to attend public hearings for the proposed rules adoptions and to give the rationale determining the agency’s decisions in that public forum.

The Mississippi legislature should also reinstate a Board of Directors for the Department of Human Services. Direct Board oversight would likely bring about rapid response to alleged Division incompetency and/or the flouting of law and block grant regulations with impunity.

As it stands now, there is no apparent state or federal consequence or any consequence of sufficient significance to change the alleged pattern and practice demonstrated by DECCD to defy federal Program guidance and the fair rule making process.

Some have said, regardless of whether or not CCDF Directors have served at the pleasure of Republican Governors or Democratic Governors, never before, in the history of Mississippi’s Child Care Development Fund, has there been an administration to just up and change CCDF Program policy – sometimes in mid-stream – through a careful play of words and/or personal interpretation often resulting in a new and unexpected application opposite an adopted rule’s understanding or intent.

And the safeguards in place to allow for a fair hearing on the merits of adverse application has not served as the deterrent it should because the DECCD Director, the individual most likely to be instructing “new and unexpected” adverse policy implementation, is also the Hearing Officer!    🙂

Jill Dent was appointed following the establishment of the State Early Childhood Advisory Council – the foremost public entity she identifies as responsible for approving the Proposed FFY 2014-2015 Mississippi CCDF State Plan.

At a recent meeting, however, child care providers questioned whether or not SECAC actually approved or even saw DECCD’s Proposed CCDF State Plan as initially filed with the Secretary of State and published in the Administrative Bulletin.  After all, the Plan sought to adopt payment to providers through the Xerox e-Childcare™ system of payment without benefit of an Economic Impact Statement and during a time in which MDHS was restrained from doing so under Chancery Court decreed Preliminary Injunction. (Click here to review page 29 of the Administrative Bulletin.)

Child Care leadership further mocked the results and questioned SECAC’s actual acceptance of the DECCD 2013 Fair Market Rate Survey which found that without any increase in child care assistance fees whatever since BEFORE three Minimum Wage increases, coupled with the rising annual costs of doing business over almost eight years, the State’s share of payment to providers in some regions has GROWN to provide a greater percentage of the 2013 fees now charged than was provided in 2011.   🙂

At last week’s public hearings, child care leadership presented comments addressing many such concerns and raised formal objections to alleged Administrative Procedures Law violations so that further legal action, if necessary, may be taken.

Jill Dent did not attend.

A Court stenographer was present.

The public hearing facilitator concluded the meeting saying all comments would be posted to the MDHS website.


DHS withdraws demand for bond – Suel Prevails

DHS withdraws demand for bond – Suel Prevails

August 16, 2013, the day after Judge Denise Owens issued Preliminary Injunction halting the implementation of the for-profit Xerox Corporation’s e-Childcare™ finger scan method of payment, MDHS attorney Doug Miracle requested an emergency hearing to request a $1,600,000.00 security bond be put up by Deloris Suel to cover the costs of damages to DHS and Xerox should it be found that the Preliminary Injunction was wrongly applied.

Although the Court was on a scheduled ten-day break, Judge Owens returned to the Court for such a hearing on August 27, 2013 in Hinds County Chancery Court.

After a brief time in Chambers, the parties emerged to enter the matter into the Court Record.

Child Care Attorney Lisa Ross had successfully argued that her client won Preliminary Injunction after a two-day trial and presentation of the evidence.

DHS withdrew its demand for a security bond.

Although Judge Owens had been using the time afforded by the Court’s scheduled ten-day break to develop her final order in Suel vs. MDHS, she offered to expedite her work to provide a final order by the end of the work week which will include clarification as to whether or not DHS may continue with its implemented phone e-Childcare™ for in-home care and the voluntary finger scan pilot program so as to prevent DHS’s stated concern for expected disruption in reimbursement payments to those affected providers.


“All Rise!” Suel vs. MDHS (videos)

“All Rise!”   Suel vs. MDHS  (videos)

At approximately 5:00 PM, August 15, 2013, State Court Judge Denise Owens issued Preliminary Injunction halting the implementation of the for-profit XEROX Corporation’s e-Childcare™ finger scan method of payment to providers.

In a final interview held at the Court House following the decision, the plaintiff was asked to share how she felt emotionally.

She responded:

“I feel as though I have been released from bondage.”

                                                                                                                                         Deloris Suel

Delta Providers received permission to film both days of Suel vs. MDHS in order to allow those of you who could not travel to Jackson to now “attend” Hinds County Chancery Court in the comfort of your own homes or centers.

After viewing,  please consider giving $10 or $25 or what ever you can afford to give this week to the Child Care Legal Fund. You may make your deposits to: MFCF Keep Mississippi Working at any Regions Bank!  (Our attorney is outstanding as you will see and needs to be paid for past and any future work!)

“How Are They Screwing the Taxpayers?”

                                                        Paul Gallo questions MDHS Executive Director Ricky Berry

To set the tone, I have provided an August 8, 2013, video of MDHS Executive Director Ricky Berry in a talk radio interview with Paul Gallo on Supertalk Mississippi. It is important to hear the accusations of fraud used, perhaps, to inflame racial bias in order to build public support for e-Childcare™ in Mississippi.  Also note the misinformation he spills on the number of licensed and non-licensed providers accepting low-income children and on two separate e-Childcare™ law suits. (The state has 1,650 licensed child care centers. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 2011 showed more than 1,300 state centers accepting child care assistance certificates of payment.)

Please note at minute mark (2:55), Ricky Berry revealed the true way DECCD would see a savings– by paying providers for actual attendance from the time a child is checked in only up to the time the child is checked out each day and NOT full day fees for full-time slots as we receive now.

Compare that to Part One, August 15, 2013, at minute mark (20:56) where Jill Dent claims she will continue to pay full-time rates for full-time slots even if a child is in attendance for only one minute on any given day and after already acknowledging the use of Louisiana’s methodology for determining “savings” projections for Mississippi. (Louisiana pays in hours and minutes for actual attendance. That IS the XEROX Solution!)

So. who do you believe? 

Review the videos below.

I am so proud of each and every provider who stayed together without submitting the Monkey Survey to MDHS or committing to e-Childcare™ against your wishes.

I am proud of those who did submit the Monkey Survey but were planning to opt out pending the Court decision!

Let me hear your thoughts on Judge Owen’s decision.

In the meantime, yáll stop that stealing!  🙂